Samsung recently unveiled a massive 10 trillion won ($7.2 billion) share repurchase program, triggering a 10% surge in its stock value. While this bold move grabbed investor attention, critics call it a “desperate” attempt to stabilize a ship struggling in turbulent waters.
In 2024, Samsung’s stock had plummeted over 40%, forcing the company to take urgent steps. The buyback is widely seen as a strategy for bolstering investor confidence and stabilizing market position. However, skeptics suggest it’s more about protecting the interests of the Lee family—the founding dynasty—who face margin calls tied to hefty bank loans. These loans were used to pay the inheritance taxes, leaving the family in a precarious financial position.
This is Samsung’s first share buyback since 2017, and even though the market reacted positively to this news, questions about long-term sustainability linger. Samsung is set to spend substantial costs to cancel of repurchased shares for 3 trillion won ($2.1 billion) over the next three months, a significant financial burden during an already challenging period.
When a company announces a share buyback program, it can lead to a positive reaction from the market, boosting earnings per share by reducing the number of shares in circulation. A notable instance occurred in May 2024, when Apple revealed a record-breaking $110 billion share repurchase authorization. This announcement, the largest in US history, drew significant attention and contributed to Apple stock gaining over 20% in just one month.
Investors hope this measure will help stop the sharp decline in Samsung’s share price amid growing concerns about the company’s management under the leadership of Lee Jae-yong, a third-generation heir of Samsung founders.
Foreign investors remain wary due to concerns that Samsung may lose its position in the rapidly changing memory chip and semiconductor manufacturing sector. The weak Q3 financial report and the lack of certification from Nvidia for the supply of memory chips for artificial intelligence products further reinforced these concerns. Adding to the pressure are political uncertainties, particularly following Donald Trump’s re-election, raising concerns about potential trade tariffs and the threat of reduced funding allocated to Samsung under the US Chips Act.
In conclusion, Samsung’s share buyback may offer temporary relief, but its long-term recovery will depend on the company’s ability to maintain its leading position in the high-tech sector. To win back investor trust and weather intensifying competition, Samsung must demonstrate resilience, innovation, and sound strategic execution. The stakes have never been higher, and the tech world is watching closely.