Pope Francis internationally acclaims AI to be the new reigning dictatorship. This could possibly strike a significant question on whether it’s time for an AI treaty? Or is AI getting out of hand. Well, it seems like so as the Council of Europe (CoE) has engrossed the first ever “legally binding” AI treaty. Signed by an international faction of countries that include the US, UK, Israel, Iceland, Norway, Republic of Moldova, Georgia, San Marino, and the European Union, among others.
Since 2019, the convention has been in negotiation terms to regulate AI policies to protect democratic principles, human rights, and governing rules. Although AI has benefited humanity in many ways, its advancements are proving to be fatally threatening to human existence.
Key strategic pointers on the AI treaty.
- On the 17th of May 2024, the Council of Europe adopted the framework on AI, human rights, democratic principles, and the governing rule of law.
- The legally binding AI treaty was in convention and open to signatures from over 57 countries on the 5th of September, 2024.
- Public demands rose to 93% in favor of voting that the AI treaty should widely address user data security and protection.
- Over 84% clearly rallied that the new AI treaty should fortify assessing the risks of AI products based on their risk factors.
- 68% summoned the AI treaty laws to scrutinize the control and use of AI policies pertaining to sectors such as employment, education, hospitality, and much more.
What is the AI treaty all about?
In 2023, over 59% of Britons have cited that the AI technology has heightened the prevalence of false information and personal data misuse. And the new AI treaty was organized to solve just that. As the Council of Europe purposes the AI treaty as a mechanism to encounter legal gaps caused by technological innovations.
The AI treaty terms clearly mandate that the technological flaws should not undermine personal data protection or secure technological development and use. Technology should no longer be able to produce biased data and misinformation in various sectors, such as hiring or other applications.
Who are included under the scope of the AI treaty?
Except for national security and defense, the AI treaty will be induced in both the public and private sector platforms’ systems use. As prominent computer scientist, Stuart Russell of British origin emphasizes how the failure to address the AI issues of the private sector could endanger public safety as a whole.
- Users of AI technologies must relevantly and routinely administer and document the impact of artificial intelligence on human value, democratic principles, and legal regulations.
- With an emphasis on non-discrimination, the AI treaty urges the need to file complaints that can challenge the AI decision-making mentality.
- Users of the AI technology should be clearly notified on how they are dealing with computerized decisions and not human-made ones.
What are the provisions outlined in the AI treaty?
Transparent functions
The AI treaty stresses the need for transparency in AI operations when dealing face-to-face with human personal data and information.
Safeguard against misinformation
Misuse of AI resulting in widespread misinformation and biased decisions should be curbed. AI operations should not breach the integrity of democratic values that ensure public justice and effective judicial administration.
Penalties or fines on breaches
All the countries that have signed in approval of the AI treaty should penalize the inappropriate use of the AI systems under law. Government bodies should exercise oversight with legal standards that are consistently enforced to avoid breaches of public security.
Accountable morale
AI operations should uphold accountability to legal and governing laws. AI policies should not violate human rights and should be challenged under law if subjected to biased misinformation. Countries that approve of the AI treaty should bring legislative and judicial customs to assure that the AI systems are operating under lawful regulations.
Risk oversight
AI operations are required to prioritize risk management tools that allow them to exercise risk oversight. Ensuring secure and ethically compliant standards are being enforced in their operations.
Overseas harmony
The international signatories of the AI treaty should bilaterally unify their practices to protect AI standards from misconduct.
Flexible regulations
With the ever-changing technological market trends, the provisions outlined in the AI treaty should be fashioned with adaptability. The policies should rapidly evolve to adjust with the growing changes in technology.
Types of threats the AI treaty can shield us from
Real life AI risks are growingly concerning, as statistics point out how 38% of employees are expected to experience unemployment with the advancement of AI technologies. The growing inequality, biased decisions, and lack of transparency and accountability are affecting the quality of life.
Secure privacy threats
Data security and privacy concerns are lingering among 81% of AI users, according to surveys. Over 62% of companies fear legal and property rights violations could emerge with the misuse of AI. Stating these factors, many countries have expressed the need for AI operations regulation, with countries like America imposing the International Covenant for civil and political rights.
AI being biased
Although AI is a machine so, it naturally can’t act partial. But if the input data is inappropriate or slanted, the resultant AI programming could be flawed with misinformation. Up to 38% of facts prescribed by the AI have been concluded to be a result of one-sided decisions. AI bias continues to be a challenge for 83% of researchers.
Societal bias is a culmination of societal cultures and beliefs that make their way to the regional AI systems for information programming through blind spots.
Unemployment on the digital rise
Within 2030, employers are expected to automate tasks or jobs that expand across a time frame of 30% of hours. Such trends can upscale the statistics rate that depict 97 million job losses by 2025. Owing to the AI systems technological prowess of automating tasks in a less time-consuming frame. Fields like automobiles, healthcare, law, and accounting are likely to join this trend in the next few years.
Technological advancements are now forcing companies to appraise their existing workforce with AI to combat market competition.
Social surveillance
The rise of predictive AI technologies with policing algorithms is secretly posing as an advantage for government agencies to track social data. Social security is at risk with advanced scrutiny of people’s personal activities, political views, or relationships.
Misinformation and conduct
Inappropriate AI system uses are threatening ethical, academic, and societal integrity. Widespread false information could uplift the societal conflicts and endanger peace. Students can academically cheat with the assistance of advanced AI systems.
Crashing financial markets
Ever heard of algorithmic trading? Yes, that’s right, such trading practices have been slowly crashing into the financial markets. AI systems, with their agile ability, can immediately make thousands of trades with the goal of smaller profits. This could increase market volatility and traumatize investors. Leading to financial chaos.
Uncontrolled AI
Estimating the power of AI technological prowess, the AI systems can soon maliciously take over human control with their intelligence. This could be uncontrollable on a huge scale. Curbing such developments has become more important than ever.
Frequently Asked Questions
What do the AI treaty terms suggest?
The legally binding AI treaty conditions that more human-centered AI systems should evolve that are transparent and accountable. Should not violate human rights, democratic values, or governing laws.
Which possible threats can the AI treaty protect us from?
From threats that endanger privacy, unbiased decisions, social surveillance, financial markets, appropriate information, employment, and others. Refer to the above article for the types of threats available.
What is covered in the AI treaty?
Except for AI systems used by national security, both the public and private sectors are subjected under the AI treaty. Infer the above article for more information.
Conclusion
The AI treaty has been applauded for its ability to harmonize global technological policies under one roof. Fostering global cooperation against a growing threat to human rights, democratic principles, and governing laws. As AI advancements could be seen as a potential threat to even international elections to hiring concerns. Undermining such problems has become more important than ever pertaining to social and public security.
Also Read:
The Psychology of Money: How Emotions Influence Financial Decisions
VPN hijacking and full-screen ads blocked in Google Play Store
